A website for all things Mr. Spong

Tag: Reflection

Ed Tech Reflection 7 – A Reflection on EDCI 336

The Obsidian Logo

Michael may have completely changed my life he stressed the importance of writing down and keeping our thoughts organized. In passing, he mentioned this app called Obsidian. I have only been using the note-taking app for about a month, and am already noticing the fruits of keeping an organized file system alongside a linked note-taking application. I’ve heard colleagues ask, “Do you know where to find x thing that y said about in that lecture last week?” and I will jump in and say, “Yes! just a moment,” I’ll open my notes app and find a link to the resource they are asking about by traversing a web of linked ideas. It is so empowering to be able to utilize my all-over-the-place way of thinking in a tangible and practical way.

I made a gif of my obsidian video!

Trevor Mackenzie discussed inquiry-based learning, which I had never heard of before. As a prospective science and mathematics teacher, I’ve been skeptical that it is possible due to the amount of content that we are required to cover.

Months later, while completing my final draft for my Professional Resource Project, I started using simulations as the primary vessel for teaching my tutoring student. We both realized that allowing the students to determine the definition on their own with subtle guidance from the teacher, led to a richer (and quicker) understanding of the material presented.

Then I had an aha! moment. This could be the bridge between inquiry learning and science/math. I am so curious to research this more and present my findings.

Later in the course, Jeff Hopkins of the Pacific School for Innovation and Inquiry spoke to us about their teaching philosophy, which flips traditional schooling on its head. Students attend this school with very little guidance, follow their own inquiry projects, and hit curricular competencies through interdisciplinary learning. It seems to me that Jeff has proved that an inquiry-based environment can provide an excellent way to teach students. It makes me wonder if our system of drawing hard lines between subjects (i.e. physics does not come with chemistry, which ia completely different from social studies) is the best approach? Perhaps this is the post-modern approach?1 I’m not sure, but for now, I am grateful for the opportunity.

I haven’t been to work yet, but I’m certain I’ve chosen the right profession.

  1. I love to say things are post-modern, but sometimes I question if I truly know what that means. I think of post-modernism as a philosophy that does not adhere to rigid structures and boundaries. That everything is connected. I could go on-and-on about these sorts of things. ↩︎

Reflection 6: AI, Ethics, and Education

On November 26, 2024, Michael led a class discussion focused on AI. As a class we considered some social, economic, environmental, and educational implications of AI technology. My colleagues and I shared our experiences with AI, homing in on how it has helped them (or hasn’t).

Photo by Rock’n Roll Monkey on Unsplash

The potential to diminish motivation for students to learn and cheating on assignments are the two most common themes I noticed during our class. Some people shared experiences that they have had with cheating students, and their opinions on the best way to approach this kind of situation.

My colleagues state that it is not difficult to spot if a student has been using AI inappropriately because:

  1. The AI does not ‘speak’ in the student’s voice. AI is often boring and devoid of personality.
  2. AI will ‘hallucinate’ incorrect information, and present it as fact.
  3. Students will not be able to explain what they have handed in.

Here’s an interesting fact from Wikipedia:

Analysts estimated that chatbots hallucinate as much as 27% of the time, with factual errors present in 46% of generated texts.

Chatbots & hallucination in 2023, Wikipedia

In the classroom, teachers should have clear expectations of when it is appropriate to use AI. Teachers should have a sound rationale as to why and how it could harm learning and a course of action if a student is suspected of unreasonable AI use.

An AI generated image of a robot writing… something. Notice the double sided glowing pencil! No mistakes here.
From The College Contemporary student magazine.

My colleagues recommend having an open dialogue with students suspected of using AI to cheat on an assignment. Essentially, be inquisitive as opposed to accusatory – direct but not confrontational, and brainstorm alternative ways for a student to prove their knowledge. According to Michigan Highschool professor Aaron Romoslawski, most of the time students use AI because they are struggling, and don’t know what to do. We need to be empathetic!

For me, the most impactful part of our conversation was when we discussed the water/power usage of AI queries. According to this article cited by the World Economic Forum, AI uses 33 TIMES more power than task-specific applications. The power required for AI computations doubles roughly every 10 days.

AI also consumes a lot of water due to this power consumption and for data centre cooling purposes. According to OECD, every 10-50 queries consumes roughly 500ml of water. In July 2010, the Independent claimed that a single Google search uses 0.5ml of water. Assuming both of these numbers are accurate today, AI queries consume 20-100 times more water per-query than a simple Google search.

Since learning this, I am hestitant to use AI at all due to it’s potential impacts on our environment. Currently Microsoft and OpenAI intend to combat this issue by opening nuclear power plants. The upside is that perhaps this is the step toward a nuclear-powered future. I believe that we will figure this out.

Reflection 5 – Inclusion in the BC Education System

What happened?

On November 18th 2024, BCEdAccess Society founder Tracy Humphreys and volunteer Kaori Lau discussed some of the systemic challenges that people living with physical, mental, or learning challenges face within the BC education system, what ableism is, and how BCEdAccess promotes equitable education practices.

BCEdAccess is a volunteer organization which seeks to “ensure equitable access to education for students with disabilities and complex learners in British Columbia.” They achieve this by providing resources to families, hosting webinars, community engagement programs, and more.

How do people living with disabilities receive asssistance?

First, a teacher, guardian, or the learner must recognize that the learner may need extra help due to an ongoing illness, mental health or physical challenge. Many students live with an undiagnosed challenge for years before it is recognized.

Next, the learner needs to apply for a psychoeducational assessment. This process can take years and cost families a significant amount of money. Tracy says that an evaluation for autism currently takes 2-3 years and costs roughly $4,000. Once they are assessed, they are assigned a “designation.”

A designation is a categorization based on the type of special education deemed appropriate for the disability. The Ministry of Education gives each category a set amount of funding to the District, which disperses these funds to schools. Abbotsford School District has posted these categorizations along with their funding amount.

What Now?

Tracy mentioned that her child didn’t receive a designation until after grade 12. She and her child decided it would be best to homeschool instead of attend school because they didn’t understand what worked for them in a learning environment. The school system therefore excluded the learner based on their disability, which was not detected/recognized until after their schooling had ended. This is very difficult for me to think about. I have member of my family who went through their schooling with a disability, but because we knew that they would have difficulties before entering school, they were able to receive a designation early on, and enjoyed their time in school because of it. The fact that this is not the case for most learners really breaks my heart.

This means that, as teachers, we need to be aware that learners may be deserving of extra help or a designation, but may not have access to it due to wait times or financial challenges. We must ensure that we promote an equitable and inclusive practice that utilizes classroom and pedagogical design that works for people with many challenges.

A One-Stop Shop for all Science Demonstrations and Simulations (Work in Progress)

You can view the project by clicking here (redirects to Google Slides).

Rationale

My driving question is, “How can I make science class exciting and accessible to students?” During my observations in science classes, I noticed that many students were disinterested in the topics presented.

I believe that excitement and accessibility are intertwined. If a student does not have the prerequisite skills to understand the presented concepts, they will likely become disinterested. Conversely, students who are uninterested in the material are unlikely to care about learning the pre-requisite material. It’s a vicious cycle.

I want to create a resource with a list of experiments/simulations for the different units of a Physics 11 class. Along with these experiment ideas could be a link to a video of a demonstration, as resources to conduct an experiment might not be available, or a student might miss the class. I would also like the resource to reference exciting content regarding the topic.

As of now, the project is available through Google Slides. I am questioning whether this will be its permanent home. The scope of the project is in a state of constant flux. I feel that my goals of including exciting content, many scientific disciplines, video examples, example probing questions, common conceptual misconceptions, etc. are a bit too lofty, but I’m happy that it has potential. I’m also happy that I know that it will be useful for some teachers, as it has already benefitted my tutoring.

© 2025 Mr. Spong's Blogs

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑